![]() ![]() To solve the control problem, a novel adaptive practical tracking control design scheme is proposed by skillfully incorporating the adaptive dynamic compensation technique into the vectorial backstepping framework. Moreover, more wide class of reference signals can be tracked since which are only first order continuously differentiable rather than higher order (more than two) continuously differentiable in the related literature. Compared with the related literature, more serious system uncertainties are allowed since the disturbances exist in all the three subsystems but only in one or two subsystems in those of the related literature. You’d be wise to put a life vest around your neck and at the very least now where are the closest life rafts.This paper is devoted to the tracking control of a class of uncertain flexible joint robots with variable stiffness actuators (VSAs). The sink is shipping, apparently there are people in the hull pumping out the water and attempting to find ways to patch the holes, but we can not see them working, and will only see if the holes are patched once the ship stops taking on water. My approach is to start by migrating away from Bubble backend and then rebuild front end in another service in the next 5 months if Bubble doesn’t do enough to make Bubble a viable option. I think that most users will be rebuilding with other services soon. Perhaps a tier in which you get 1,000 emails, 200 pdfs, 10,000 words from AI and features like trello board…in which case, no you likely won’t be able to charge per trello board drop or put a cap on the number of drops available because likely users wouldn’t want to use a system that causes them to have to consider every move they make (much like how Bubble is going to lose most of their user base for the same very reasons)…īut hey, we’ve got 17 more months to see what Bubble does / (more than likely doesn’t do) for us to either stick with Bubble or start rebuilding our apps using different services. Various combination possibilities when you think a bit more creatively on the topic. Still doesn’t sit right with me, but keen to hear more. Do we start creating our own artbitrary usage metrics? Like imagine a Trello competitor… “You’ve used up all your card drops this month, increase your limit to keep editing your board”. I’d be very curious to hear an example of how this could work for your non-generative app cases. Got to push forward with what is available to you, and asking Bubble to make some more details like per user WFU metrics are things that if we had, would make more possibilities for how we decide to price our products. I’m all about working with what I have and not worrying about what I wish I had or dwelling on what I don’t have. So, if a SaaS built on Bubble offers users access to email communications, PDF for reports, AI for chatbots etc…these things can be price based off of usage, and so it would be great for Bubble to give use those details of our users without our need to create workflows that eat up our WFUs to have those details. This way we could do some of the things that is traditionally accepted like creating tiers, as well as some of the things Bubble is doing, like pricing on usage, and there are some other services like PDF creators that price based on usage like number of PDFs created in a month, as well as email providers that price based on usage like number of emails sent in a month. Just another example of how this decision has eroded the value of building on Bubble.īut, given the fact that anybody who wants to build a business using Bubble would need to figure out a way to price their SaaS in the traditional and market accepted form, it would at least be beneficial to see some sort of metrics per user so we could extrapolate a bit more detail on a user. This is sad! This is frustrating and this is unfair. Until reach this momento, we have to “accept no opportunity to complain and be heard” about some questionable actions from Emmanuel/ Bubble. My company is already in the process of migrating, we will leave Bubble. Have you ever noticed that when you modify a workflow, the Charts (On App Metricis) basically don’t change? So, how to optimize something that was made for you to have the highest workload rates (so that Bubble can profit)? But Bubble says that we have to know how to “learn to do”… Bubble wants you know how to optimize your App, based on almost zero information.īubble tells you what to do, but doesn’t teach you how. Bubble, simply created something imposing that we know more than it offers us access to knowledge. ![]() Even worse when we have to analyze it in the Backend, then it’s a Pandora’s box. Hello we pay attention, in fact, Bubble is very badly making these indicators (Work loads) and their real triggers. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |